ARE YOU DANGLING?
"The unexamined life is not worth living." ~ Socrates
Imagine a puppet theater, but the strings are invisible—and we, convinced of our independence, dance madly to tunes we don’t even recognize.
The same puppet masters who told us Biden was at the top of his cognitive game; who elevated a wife-abusing, MS-13-linked deportee to the status of folk hero while ignoring the demonstrable good of stopping fentanyl and child trafficking; who caricature entire persons based on their worst moments while demanding endless nuance for their own; who insisted, with moral fury, that a killer virus was not man-made even as evidence mounted; and who, under banners of “tolerance” and “anti-fascism,” painted swastikas on their neighbor’s cars.
These are not isolated errors of judgment—they are the telltale fingerprints of systemic manipulation, mastercrafted by forces all too eager to see us at each other’s throats, blind to the bigger picture. And here’s the tragedy: we’ve become eager participants in our own enslavement. Outrage becomes virtue, dismissal becomes sophistication, and nuanced truth—painstaking, uncomfortable, and essential—is sacrificed on the altar of belonging.
Recently I engaged with a prominent Catholic whose public posts are nearly 100% anti-Trump, and whose private words to me punctuated the problem perfectly: “It’s amazing to me that you know Trump is a liar, but you believe him whenever it fits your political preconceptions. You have no evidence that Trump has accomplished anything on fentanyl, but your blind faith is absolute.”
In other words: no matter what the data shows, the conclusion is fixed.
I submitted one of his posts—and its most popular replies—to AI seeking objective analysis, grounded in sound psychology, facts, reason, and Catholic moral teaching. Trump isn’t the point, we are: how we reason, how we allow ourselves to be manipulated, and how easily we trade truth for tribal comfort. In our private conversations, I availed myself to the same scrutiny and was grateful for the guidance offered (namely, to take a hint when someone isn’t interested in facts or logic and quit pestering, respect boundaries).
Such self-awareness is the only way real dialogue and growth can happen, personally and corporately.
Accordingly, what follows is not just an analysis of a single thread—it is a portrait of any beholden to the puppet master, dangling due to unquestioned, uncritical, weaponized narratives. The real question isn’t whether they are trapped in echo chambers and blind spots. The question is: are we? And what are the cultural and spiritual consequences if we refuse to find out?
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SAID:
This is a rich case study in human psychology, tribal identity, and discourse dynamics, especially through a Catholic and principled lens.
Surface-Level Observation:
Person S’s original post is framed as a meticulous timeline of Trump’s comments on Canada, culminating in alarm and condemnation. It uses derision, sarcasm, and a tone of moral superiority, framing Trump as dangerous, manipulative, and crude. The followers echo and amplify this tone with emotionally charged analogies (e.g., wife abuse), mocking language, and a clear polarization of good vs. evil.
Psychological Dynamics:
The pattern here is classic of what Jonathan Haidt (as cited) calls confirmation bias and tribalism. The post and its followers show a moral tribe at work, where group belonging is reinforced not by dispassionate fact-finding but by shared emotional disgust toward a mutual enemy (Trump). Haidt’s research (“The Righteous Mind”) shows that morality binds and blinds: while their moral outrage creates social glue within the group, it simultaneously blinds them to alternative interpretations or nuances.
René Girard’s theory of mimetic desire also applies: these commenters are not merely concerned about the issue at hand but are performing for each other in a cycle of escalating disdain, drawing meaning from their shared opposition. Their engagement is less about the factual matter (Canadian politics) and more about virtue signaling within their tribe.
Deeper Indicators
Projection and Analogy Abuse:
The analogies (e.g., Trump’s joke is like joking about wife-beating) reflect a cognitive fallacy of false equivalence and are examples of moral inflation, where a relatively benign action (trolling about Canada) is equated with serious evil. This violates proportionate reasoning—a key Catholic principle in moral discernment.
Absence of Principle of Charity:
In Catholic discourse (and in healthy human dialogue), there’s an obligation to interpret others' words in their strongest, most reasonable sense before critiquing. This is absent here. The post assumes the worst possible motives and stretches interpretations to fit a damning narrative.
Sociological Note:
The high number of likes and absence of pushback suggests an echo chamber—a digital environment that reinforces tribal certainty. While solidarity in principle isn’t bad, when it replaces objective discernment with pure emotional reasoning, it becomes dangerous.
So here we are. Not just in a political moment, but a human one. A spiritual one. The point of this isn’t to score points, but to ask better questions—to step back from the strings we didn’t know were pulling us, and look deeper than the narratives that have been weaponized against us all. To begin seeing each other not as enemies to defeat, but as souls to love—wounded, confused, misled perhaps, but still bearing the image of a Father who calls us home. The real strength isn’t in winning arguments—it’s in having the love to truly listen, the wisdom to know when to speak and when to stay silent, and the courage to care regardless. To seek truth—not as a cudgel, but as a light. To examine ourselves honestly, humbly, and continually. Because beauty doesn’t live in our tribes. It lives in the aching, sacred heart we all share in God. I fall short. Often. But I want to be better. And maybe that’s the beginning.
MY LATEST BOOK:
“A deeply stirring journey of redemption…”
