AN INVITATION TO HOLOCAUST DENIERS

Let's Have the Conversation

An Invitation

At the very outset, let me convey with the greatest earnestness and sincerity: I am committed to respectful conversation. If you have sourced information contesting anything said herein, you are not only welcome but encouraged to bring it forward. Truth thrives in the light of honest debate, and that which remains unsaid proclaims what remains the victor.

The sources provided at the end represent a small selection from the extensive body of evidence that has been meticulously documented and rigorously examined—none of which has been credibly contested by serious scholarship. This is the standard of evidence, and it is the standard I ask for in return.

For most, Holocaust denial is akin to claiming the earth is flat—an idea so untethered from reason it seems hardly worth addressing. Yet its troubling resurgence, particularly among younger generations, demands careful examination. Alarmingly, this denial is sometimes miscast as a distorted form of conservatism when, in truth, it emerges from the same cultural poison that elevates feelings over facts, untethers truth from evidence, and leaves us rudderless in a sea of subjective caprice.

As Christians, we are called to truth because God is truth (Veritas). Pope Benedict XVI reminds us that “to deny or minimize the Holocaust is intolerable and altogether unacceptable,” for it undermines not only historical fact but the moral duty to remember and honor the dignity of the victims. At stake here is not merely the denial of the systematic, horrific murder of millions of people but something even more consequential: the denial of our most defining human quality—our capacity for reason and understanding.

As G.K. Chesterton observed, "When people stop believing in God, they don’t believe in nothing—they believe in anything." Today, this tragedy extends beyond faith to reason itself. A cultural zeitgeist, fueled by extreme skepticism and relativism, has left society fractured and truth subordinated to power—a nightmare Nietzsche himself foresaw.

This essay is written to challenge that disorder and invite all who question the Holocaust into the light of reasoned discourse. It is not enough to dismiss denial as the delusion of fringe thinkers; it must be confronted as a symptom of deeper cultural decay. In this confrontation lies an opportunity to defend history and reclaim our capacity for truth, reason, and the dignity of human understanding.

---

Nazi Complicity in the Holocaust: Evidence in Their Own Words

The complicity of Adolf Hitler, the Nazi regime, and their operatives in the genocide of six million Jews is irrefutably documented through their own words and policies. Far from being an invention of post-war historians, the systematic extermination of Jews—what the Nazis themselves called the “Final Solution”—is evidenced in speeches, orders, and administrative records created by the perpetrators. Of consequential note: not a single defendant brought before the Nuremberg Trials in 1948 denied the atrocity, nor did any of the 170 in the subsequent trials.

Key Evidence

1. Adolf Hitler’s Reichstag Speech (January 30, 1939)

Quote: “If the international Jewish financiers inside and outside Europe should succeed in plunging the nations once more into a world war, then the result will not be the Bolshevization of the earth, and thus the victory of Jewry, but the annihilation of the Jewish race in Europe.”

Significance: Hitler explicitly tied the outbreak of war to the "annihilation" of European Jewry, foreshadowing the genocidal policies that would follow. This speech reflects the ideological foundation of the Holocaust, rooted in Hitler’s antisemitic worldview.

Source: Adolf Hitler, Speech to the Reichstag, January 30, 1939. Transcript available at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM).

2. The Wannsee Conference Protocol (January 20, 1942)

Policy Statement: At this meeting of senior Nazi officials, led by SS-Obergruppenführer Reinhard Heydrich, the "Final Solution" was discussed and coordinated.

Quote: “Under proper guidance, the Jews are to be utilized for work in the East. In the course of the practical execution of the Final Solution, Europe will be combed through from west to east.”

Explanation: Euphemisms like "evacuation" and "utilized for work" were used, but the context and subsequent actions leave no doubt that the meeting was about planning mass extermination. Deportation to death camps and systematic murder were at the core of this policy.

Source: Wannsee Conference Protocol. English translation available through the Avalon Project at Yale Law School.

3. Heinrich Himmler’s Posen Speech (October 4, 1943)

Quote: “I am now referring to the evacuation of the Jews, the extermination of the Jewish people. … Most of you will know what it means when 100 corpses lie next to each other, or 500, or 1,000. To have stuck it out and at the same time—apart from exceptions caused by human weakness—to have remained decent fellows, that is what has made us hard.”

Significance: In this speech to SS officers, Himmler explicitly acknowledged the mass murder of Jews, referring to it as a necessary, albeit morally numbing, act for the Nazi regime.

Source: Heinrich Himmler, Speech at Posen, October 4, 1943. Transcript available at the German Federal Archives and the Holocaust History Project.

4. Joseph Goebbels’ Diary Entry (March 27, 1942)

Quote: “A judgment is being carried out on the Jews which is barbaric, but fully deserved. The prophecy which the Führer made about them for causing a new world war is beginning to come true in a most terrible way.”

Significance: Goebbels, Hitler’s Propaganda Minister, explicitly connected Hitler’s earlier threats against the Jews to the ongoing extermination, reflecting the regime’s ideological justification for genocide.

Source: Joseph Goebbels, The Goebbels Diaries, 1942–1943, edited and translated by Louis P. Lochner. New York: Doubleday, 1948.

5. Rudolf Höss’ Confession (Commandant of Auschwitz)

Quote: “I commanded Auschwitz until 1 December 1943, and estimate that at least 2.5 million victims were executed and exterminated there by gassing and burning.”

Context: Höss, who oversaw Auschwitz, confessed to the industrialized mass murder of Jews. Though captured and tried under Allied authority, his testimony aligns with physical evidence and Nazi records.

Source: Nuremberg Trials Documentation, 1946. Avalon Project, Yale Law School.

---

Significance of the Evidence

These statements and policies leave no doubt that the Holocaust was a deliberate, systematic genocide carried out with bureaucratic precision. To ignore such overwhelming evidence is to deny reality itself. Hitler and his inner circle not only envisioned the extermination of the Jews but implemented it with chilling efficiency, leaving a documented trail that confirms their culpability beyond dispute.

The Evidence is Overwhelming

The Holocaust is not supported by isolated anecdotes or hearsay; it is substantiated by an unparalleled convergence of evidence that leaves no room for doubt. The documentation, testimonies, and forensic analyses from this atrocity are among human history's most detailed and comprehensive.

Key Forms of Evidence

1. Primary Nazi Documents
   Orders, speeches, and records such as the Wannsee Protocol and Himmler’s Posen Speech explicitly detail plans to exterminate Jews. These records, created by the perpetrators themselves, expose the systematic nature of the genocide.

2. Eyewitness Testimonies
   Millions of survivors, bystanders, and perpetrators have provided consistent and corroborated accounts of the genocide. The sheer volume and alignment of these testimonies make denial intellectually untenable.

3. Forensic Evidence
   Mass graves, remains of gas chambers, chemical residues from Zyklon B, and ground-penetrating radar studies confirm the scale and method of the killings.

4. Post-War Trials
   The Nuremberg Trials and other proceedings brought Nazi leaders to justice, with many confessing to the crimes. These confessions were supported by evidence presented during trial proceedings.

---

Three Essential Questions for Holocaust Deniers

1. The Evidence Question
   Suppose the Holocaust did not occur as documented. How do you explain the convergence of independent and corroborated evidence, including Nazi orders, the Wannsee Protocol, Einsatzgruppen reports, forensic analyses of gas chambers, and testimonies from survivors, perpetrators, and bystanders, all pointing to a systematic plan to exterminate Jews?
   
   Follow-Up: Why would perpetrators such as Heinrich Himmler, Adolf Eichmann, and Rudolf Höss confess to and document these crimes, often in ways that implicated themselves, if they were fabricated?

2. The Conspiracy Question
   If the Holocaust is a fabrication, how do you account for the vast conspiracy required to sustain it, involving thousands of survivors, historians, governments, forensic scientists, and institutions over nearly 80 years without a single credible whistleblower or document proving such a fabrication?
   
   Follow-Up: How do you reconcile this belief in a massive, global conspiracy with Occam’s Razor the principle that the simplest explanation (that the Holocaust occurred as documented) is most likely true?
   

3. The Double Standard Question
   Why do you demand absolute, irrefutable proof of every single aspect of the Holocaust while readily accepting debunked claims, such as those of David Irving or Robert Faurisson, which lack primary-source evidence and have been rejected by courts and the academic community?
   
   Follow-Up: What objective standard of evidence would you accept to revise your views, and why have you not applied that standard to Holocaust denial claims?

---

The Burden of Proof and Intellectual Honesty

A foundational principle of reasoning is that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Holocaust denial, which rejects the consensus of thousands of scholars, institutions, eyewitnesses, and physical evidence, makes an extraordinary claim: that one of the most well-documented atrocities in human history is a fabrication. Such a position demands an overwhelming burden of proof.

Yet, Holocaust denial repeatedly fails to meet even the most basic standards of evidence. Instead, it relies on:

1. Cherry-picking fragments of misinformation—discredited claims about the Red Cross, misinterpreted census data, or deliberate distortions of survivor accounts.

2. Debunked and discredited scholars, such as David Irving, Robert Faurisson, or Dariusz Ratajczak, whose methodologies and conclusions have been universally condemned by legitimate historians.

3. Conspiracy theories require the collusion of countless survivors, perpetrators, historians, governments, and institutions across decades while producing no tangible evidence to support such claims.

If one denies the Holocaust based on this foundation, the onus is on them to present credible, sourced evidence that stands up to scrutiny—not merely to dismiss mountains of documented proof with "questions" or contrarian assertions.

Critical Thinking vs. Ideological Bias

Critical thinking requires more than skepticism—it demands intellectual humility and a willingness to engage with evidence, even when it challenges preconceived notions. Those who deny the Holocaust often pride themselves on being “free thinkers,” yet their arguments reveal a lack of the intellectual rigor they claim to champion. Consider the following:

1. Selective Skepticism: Why is exhaustive evidence for the Holocaust dismissed as “propaganda,” while dubious claims from discredited figures like Irving or Faurisson are accepted without question?

2. Conspiratorial Thinking: Why is it more plausible to believe in an unfathomable global conspiracy spanning governments, institutions, and survivors, than to accept the documented policies and actions of the Nazi regime?

3. Double Standards: Why demand absolute proof for the Holocaust while offering no credible proof for the alternative narrative?

True critical thinking involves weighing the totality of evidence, not clinging to fragments that confirm a pre-existing bias.

---

Confronting the Stakes

The stakes of Holocaust denial go far beyond historical ignorance. This denial represents a deliberate assault on memory, justice, and the very foundations of truth. It is not simply an isolated falsehood—it reflects a dangerous epistemological failure that, if applied broadly, would unravel the basis of societal order and the shared reality upon which communities are built. To deny the Holocaust is to call into question the very ways in which we know what we know, with dire implications for human progress and cohesion.

Immediate Consequences of Denial

1. Dishonors the Victims

Six million Jews and millions of others were systematically murdered in an act of industrialized genocide. Denial erases their suffering, robs survivors of justice, and dehumanizes entire populations. It is a profound moral failure to remember and honor the dead.

2. Legitimizes Hate

Holocaust denial is often rooted in antisemitism and serves as a gateway to further bigotry and violence. By erasing the evidence of past atrocities, denial paves the way for their repetition and emboldens extremist ideologies.

3. Undermines Historical Understanding

Holocaust denial sets a dangerous precedent for erasing other historical truths. If one of the most exhaustively documented events in human history can be dismissed, it opens the door for the denial of other atrocities, injustices, and shared realities. Such a trend would leave humanity untethered from the lessons of its own past.

Broader Implications for Society

The rejection of established historical truths reflects a broader epistemological crisis—a breakdown in the ways we collectively determine and accept what is true. If such a framework of denial were applied to society writ-large, the consequences would be catastrophic:

1. Breakdown of Shared Reality

Civil society relies on a foundation of commonly accepted facts and truths. Holocaust denial, as an extreme form of relativism, undermines this shared reality and replaces it with subjective narratives rooted in ideology rather than evidence. Without a basis for agreement on fundamental truths, the bonds of social trust and cooperation begin to fray.

2. Erosion of Justice Systems

The rule of law depends on the ability to establish and adjudicate truth. If the principles of evidence, testimony, and documentation are rejected—hallmarks of Holocaust denial—legal and social institutions lose their ability to function, creating chaos and undermining justice for victims of crimes.

3. Rise of Authoritarianism

Historical denial often serves as a tool for authoritarian regimes seeking to rewrite history and consolidate power. By erasing inconvenient truths, such regimes create a vacuum where propaganda and power supplant evidence and accountability. Holocaust denial is a warning sign of this dangerous trajectory.

4. Dehumanization and Division

Denial of historical atrocities like the Holocaust contributes to the dehumanization of marginalized groups. When truth itself becomes a matter of opinion, it fosters division, prejudice, and societal fragmentation, leading to conflict and instability.

A Warning from History

If the epistemology underlying Holocaust denial were normalized, society would enter a dystopian state akin to what Friedrich Nietzsche warned of—a world where truth is abandoned and replaced by the "will to power." In such a world, reality is determined not by evidence but by those with the loudest voices or greatest strength. Justice, human rights, and shared progress would become impossible, leaving humanity adrift in a sea of competing falsehoods.

As Pope Benedict XVI observed, “May humanity never forget or deny the Holocaust. Let it remain a warning against the destructive power of hatred and prejudice.” This warning is not just about remembering the past but protecting the present and future from the corrosive effects of denial and relativism.

Holocaust denial is not simply a denial of history—it is a rejection of truth itself. In confronting it, we safeguard the principles that uphold human dignity, justice, and the shared foundations of civilization.

A Challenge

If you genuinely believe the Holocaust is a fabrication, I challenge you to meet the same standard of evidence that Holocaust historians have upheld for decades:

1. Present primary sources—authenticated documents, testimonies, or forensic studies—that substantiate your claims.

2. Reconcile your narrative with the extensive Nazi documentation admitting to the “Final Solution.”

3. Explain how millions of survivors, historians, governments, and institutions have conspired to fabricate evidence for nearly 80 years without a single credible whistleblower.

If you cannot meet these criteria, it is incumbent upon you to reevaluate your position. True intellectual honesty requires admitting when one is wrong.

Conclusion

This essay is not written to condemn but to challenge, and invite respectful conversation. Holocaust denial is not a harmless exercise in skepticism; it is an affront to memory, truth, and justice. To those who deny the Holocaust, I invite you to engage with the overwhelming body of evidence. Questioning is human, but denying reality in the face of irrefutable truth rejects the foundation of reason and intellectual integrity.

Pope John Paul II, speaking at Auschwitz, profoundly stated: “Never again. Never again hatred. Never again genocide.” These words challenge us to honor the memory of the victims, to confront denial wherever it arises, and to ensure that such atrocities are never repeated. As Christians, as seekers of truth, and as defenders of human dignity, we have a moral obligation to confront Holocaust denial with courage and clarity.

Truth thrives in the light, and history demands accountability. This conversation is not simply about refuting Holocaust denial—it is about affirming our shared commitment to truth, reason, and humanity itself. Here is an invitation to rise to the occasion, not only to honor the past but to safeguard the future.

---

NOTES

Wannsee Conference Protocol (1942)
Source: United States Holocaust Memorial Museum (USHMM)
https://www.ushmm.org

Heinrich Himmler’s Posen Speech (October 4, 1943)
Source: German Federal Archives; available through Holocaust History Project
https://www.holocaust-history.org

The Nuremberg Trials Documentation
Source: Avalon Project, Yale Law School
https://avalon.law.yale.edu

Einsatzgruppen Reports
Source: Holocaust Historical Society
https://www.holocausthistoricalsociety.org.uk

---

Catholic Affirmations and Statements

Nostra Aetate (1965)
Source: Second Vatican Council Document
https://www.vatican.va

Pope John Paul II at Auschwitz (1979)
Source: Vatican Archives
https://www.vatican.va

Pope Benedict XVI’s Yad Vashem Visit (2009)
Source: Vatican News Archives
https://www.vaticannews.va

Pope Francis on Holocaust Denial (2016)
Source: Vatican News Reports, 2016 Speech
https://www.vaticannews.va

---

Academic Works and Scholars

Raul Hilberg
Work: The Destruction of the European Jews
Yale University Press, 2003

Jean-Claude Pressac
Work: Auschwitz: Technique and Operation of the Gas Chambers
The Beate Klarsfeld Foundation, 1989

Robert Jan van Pelt
Work: The Case for Auschwitz: Evidence from the Irving Trial
Indiana University Press, 2002

Deborah Lipstadt
Work: Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory
Free Press, 1993

Richard J. Evans
Work: Lying About Hitler: History, Holocaust, and the David Irving Trial
Basic Books, 2002

Christopher Browning
Work: Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland
Harper Perennial, 1993

Yehuda Bauer
Work: A History of the Holocaust
Franklin Watts, 2001

Pierre Vidal-Naquet
Work: Assassins of Memory: Essays on the Denial of the Holocaust
Columbia University Press, 1992

Franciszek Piper
Work: Auschwitz: How Many Perished
Auschwitz-Birkenau State Museum, 1994

Caroline Sturdy Colls
Work: Holocaust Archaeologies: Approaches and Future Directions
Springer, 2015

---

Holocaust Memorial Institutions

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
https://www.ushmm.org

Yad Vashem – The World Holocaust Remembrance Center
https://www.yadvashem.org

Auschwitz-Birkenau Memorial and Museum
https://www.auschwitz.org