It's not really possible to proof a negative, but we can discuss the evidence and the implications.
I don't believe this to be sufficient evidence to proof mass exterminations.
I've unfortunately lost my twitter accounts but I was followed by about 20 big accounts, including 4 MP's. I only have my rumble left. www.rumble.com/user/DavidAqua.
By the way there is nothing hateful or antisemitic about disagreeing with Jews or people at large.
I don't really prefer debates over text but sure, I have 3 questions.
All the evidence you've provided here are a few statements that could seem to indicate something, is enough to proof a genocide of supposedly 6 million people?
I think not.
What sources have you researched? From the skeptical side.
If you would come to the conclusion that it did not happen as told, would you feel comfortable saying that?
I'm not sure what you're saying. I provide solid sources that overwhelmingly establish what happened. I would put on you: Of the nearly 200 tried at Nuremberg, a number with death sentence is lingering over their heads, not one contested the facticity of the Holocaust. Not one. Are you saying "it" didn't happen? If so, please give me your solid, credible sources that countermand the overwhelming testimony of everyone who had first-hand exposure and everything around it. Otherwise, let's not waste each other's time.
I see why you were booted from other platforms. There ought to be a minimal IQ and courtesy for those interested in fairly processing facts with logic.
I would gladly debate the issue.
It's not really possible to proof a negative, but we can discuss the evidence and the implications.
I don't believe this to be sufficient evidence to proof mass exterminations.
I've unfortunately lost my twitter accounts but I was followed by about 20 big accounts, including 4 MP's. I only have my rumble left. www.rumble.com/user/DavidAqua.
By the way there is nothing hateful or antisemitic about disagreeing with Jews or people at large.
Feel free to respond, have a good day.
Feel free to contest sourced info in the articles.
I don't really prefer debates over text but sure, I have 3 questions.
All the evidence you've provided here are a few statements that could seem to indicate something, is enough to proof a genocide of supposedly 6 million people?
I think not.
What sources have you researched? From the skeptical side.
If you would come to the conclusion that it did not happen as told, would you feel comfortable saying that?
I'm not sure what you're saying. I provide solid sources that overwhelmingly establish what happened. I would put on you: Of the nearly 200 tried at Nuremberg, a number with death sentence is lingering over their heads, not one contested the facticity of the Holocaust. Not one. Are you saying "it" didn't happen? If so, please give me your solid, credible sources that countermand the overwhelming testimony of everyone who had first-hand exposure and everything around it. Otherwise, let's not waste each other's time.
'Proof to me big foot isn't real.
Plenty of people saw it.
Now proof to me it isn't real!!'
Lol.
I see why you were booted from other platforms. There ought to be a minimal IQ and courtesy for those interested in fairly processing facts with logic.